Dear Friends:
I mentioned last week that there's been a fairly robust conversation among pastors and theologians lately concerning a recent Vatican ruling on the question of Catholic clergy blessing the unions of GLBTQ people. The short and simple answer to the question is "No," which is literally as blunt as the Vatican statement said it. I'm not sure that many were surprised by the content of that communication, because it's nothing other than a reiteration of what's been said before. But its juridical—and frankly completely non-pastoral—tone is what caught many by surprise. It didn't have the smell of Pope Francis about it, which is to say that it did not bear any witness to having engaged in thoughtful conversation with actual people who live with personal questions of sexual orientation and identity.
The pope has been regular in his insistence that the church must be about the habit of "engagement," which means locating itself where real people live amid all the complexities and ambiguities of life "on the ground," which is a harder thing to do than issuing edicts from behind the walls of Vatican offices. It is well known that the pope has been resisted in that effort by powerful forces in the Roman Curia, for whom categorical, disembodied definitions and decrees are the way that things were done for decades prior to Francis' arrival. Actually, it would be more accurate to say that it was done that way for centuries. It's a practice that dates back to a time about a thousand years ago when the idea of "church teaching" began to be equated with "canon law." Those two things are related, but they are not the same thing. And that means that one hasn't really put to rest a theological or pastoral dispute merely by citing the law (which is itself the product of human development and not an artifact dropped from the heavens by God.)
Why does any of this matter? Because Catholic Christian communities like ours work very hard to be broadly welcoming and respectful of the faith and life journeys of all who sincerely seek God in the church. Not to acknowledge this effort and these people is to be something less than true to our profession of faith in Jesus Christ who was the greatest welcomer who ever lived.
To welcome, as Jesus showed us, doesn't always mean to agree with, or to collapse the gospel into whatever people want to hear. But it does mean the requirement of empathetic listening and the honoring of human dignity—not as an abstraction or as a "natural law," but as embodied in the persons who present themselves at the thresholds of our churches expecting to be meaningfully engaged, with their stories taken seriously. In other words, it means sometimes hard work and a willingness to step into a world view other than our own in order to better understand. It means real "encounter." In many cases, the Vatican dicasteries have done a more honorable job that way in dealing with Jews, Muslims, and Atheists than they have in dealing with professed Catholics.
A terse response of "No" to a matter as complex, intimate, important and mysterious as committed human relationships is something with which we ought not to be satisfied. Nor should we wonder, on this account, why some people at the margins of public/religious opinion find something other than attraction to the Catholic community. It is our task at the local level to behave better than this, not only in order to placate the disappointment of minority communities, but in order to be true to our own Christian selves.
Fr. Mike
CLICK ON IMAGE BELOW FOR A VIDEO MESSAGE FROM FR. MIKE